NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsISO 26000:2010
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to ISO 26000:2010. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to ISO 26000:2010 with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Govern.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
Map(4 mappings)
Measure(3 mappings)
Manage(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other ISO 26000:2010 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO 26000:2010?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while ISO 26000:2010 covers 60 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Govern, where 14 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct ISO 26000:2010 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO 26000:2010?
Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 5 map directly to ISO 26000:2010 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to ISO 26000:2010?
47 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26000:2010. The highest concentration of gaps is in Govern with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO 26000:2010?
The domain with the highest gap count is Govern (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.