OECD AI PrinciplesvsISO 26000:2010
See exactly how OECD AI Principles controls map to ISO 26000:2010. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OECD AI Principles maps to ISO 26000:2010 with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 OECD AI Principles controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Recommendations to Policymakers.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.
Values-Based Principles(5 mappings)
OECD AI Principles: AI Data Governance(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OECD AI Principles comparisons
Other ISO 26000:2010 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 726 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OECD AI Principles and ISO 26000:2010?
OECD AI Principles has 46 controls across its framework, while ISO 26000:2010 covers 60 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Recommendations to Policymakers, where 5 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct ISO 26000:2010 equivalent.
How many controls map between OECD AI Principles and ISO 26000:2010?
Of 46 total OECD AI Principles controls, 3 map directly to ISO 26000:2010 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OECD AI Principles to ISO 26000:2010?
43 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26000:2010. The highest concentration of gaps is in Recommendations to Policymakers with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OECD AI Principles and ISO 26000:2010?
The domain with the highest gap count is Recommendations to Policymakers (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.