Cross-Framework Mapping

NIS2 DirectivevsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)

See exactly how NIS2 Directive controls map to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIS2 Directive maps to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIS2 Directive controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Risk Management(3 mappings)

NIS2D-2Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures - Article 213 targets
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response

Incident Reporting(1 mappings)

NIS2D-3Incident Reporting Obligations - Articles 23 and 30
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance

Supply Chain(2 mappings)

NIS2D-5Supply Chain Security - Article 21(2)(d) and 222 targets
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing

Vulnerability Management(2 mappings)

NIS2D-6Vulnerability Disclosure and CVD Programme - Article 12 and 212 targets
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing

International Cooperation(1 mappings)

NIS2D-8Cross-Border Coordination, ENISA, CSIRTs Network, and CER Coordination
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIS2 Directive and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

NIS2 Directive has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement, where 1 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIS2 Directive and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

Of 8 total NIS2 Directive controls, 5 map directly to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIS2 Directive to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

3 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIS2 Directive and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.