Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

Name: MITRE ATT&CK to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

35%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with 35% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Tactic.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

MITRE ATT&CK: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

MITRE-04Roles and responsibilities definition

→EU-CRA-04Roles and responsibilities definition

MITRE ATT&CK: Asset Management(10 mappings)

MITRE-06Asset inventory and ownership3 targets

→EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets

→EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures

→EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal

MITRE-07Acceptable use of assets3 targets

→EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets

→EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures

→EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal

MITRE-08Information classification and labeling

→EU-CRA-08Information classification and labeling

MITRE-09Asset handling procedures3 targets

→EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets

→EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures

→EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal

MITRE ATT&CK: Access Control(9 mappings)

MITRE-11Access control policy and enforcement3 targets

→EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management

→EU-CRA-14Privileged access management

→EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification

MITRE-12User access management and provisioning4 targets

→EU-CRA-12User access management and provisioning

→EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management

→EU-CRA-14Privileged access management

→EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification

MITRE-13Authentication and password management

→EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management

MITRE-14Privileged access management

→EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 2143418 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND18 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 2704318 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS18 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS18 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs ETSI EN 303 64518 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP SAMM18 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs SSDF (NIST)18 mappings

Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 730 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

MITRE ATT&CK has 52 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Tactic, where 12 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

Of 52 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 18 map directly to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

34 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Tactic with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Tactic (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.