NIST SP 800-137vsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-137 controls map to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-137 maps to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with 58% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 NIST SP 800-137 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in NIST SP 800-137: Communications Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
NIST SP 800-137: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)
NIST SP 800-137: Asset Management(10 mappings)
NIST SP 800-137: Access Control(9 mappings)
+20 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-137 comparisons
Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-137 and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
NIST SP 800-137 has 31 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in NIST SP 800-137: Communications Security, where 4 NIST SP 800-137 controls have no direct Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-137 and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
Of 31 total NIST SP 800-137 controls, 18 map directly to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-137 to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
13 NIST SP 800-137 controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The highest concentration of gaps is in NIST SP 800-137: Communications Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-137 and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
The domain with the highest gap count is NIST SP 800-137: Communications Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.