TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsISO 19011

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to ISO 19011. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to ISO 19011 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container2 targets
→6.4Logging and Monitoring
→6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control2 targets
→6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
→6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container2 targets
→6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
→6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappings

Other ISO 19011 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 190117 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO 190116 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 190116 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO 190116 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 190116 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 190116 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO 190116 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO 190116 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 19011?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct ISO 19011 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 19011?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 3 map directly to ISO 19011 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to ISO 19011?

5 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 19011?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.