Cross-Framework Mapping

MDS2 (Medical Device)vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how MDS2 (Medical Device) controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MDS2 (Medical Device) maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Audit Logging Integrity and Cybersecurity Risk - MDS2(2 mappings)

MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring2 targets
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

PHI Data Handling Storage and Transmission - MDS2(3 mappings)

MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS3 targets
ISO-15189-6.2Personnel
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

Authentication and Authorization - MDS2(2 mappings)

MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management2 targets
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

Related Comparisons

Other MDS2 (Medical Device) comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MDS2 (Medical Device) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

MDS2 (Medical Device) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2, where 1 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between MDS2 (Medical Device) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 8 total MDS2 (Medical Device) controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MDS2 (Medical Device) to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

5 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MDS2 (Medical Device) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.