MARS-EvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how MARS-E controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
MARS-E maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MARS-E controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Access Control and Identity Authentication - MARS-E v2.0(2 mappings)
Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0(3 mappings)
Incident Response and Breach Notification - MARS-E v2.0(2 mappings)
Privacy PII PHI Protection - MARS-E v2.0(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other MARS-E comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between MARS-E and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
MARS-E has 8 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0, where 1 MARS-E controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between MARS-E and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 8 total MARS-E controls, 5 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
3 MARS-E controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.