Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal DatavsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution
See exactly how Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Article 4-12(1 mappings)
Security + Article 25 + Breach Notification + Article 22(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?
Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024, where 1 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution equivalent.
How many controls map between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?
Of 8 total Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data to ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?
6 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?
The domain with the highest gap count is Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.