TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 24% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Prevention Measures.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Prohibitions(3 mappings)

Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
Art.13Prohibition of Data Interference
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Obligations of Service Providers(1 mappings)

Art.20Service Provider Duties
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Procedural Powers(6 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data4 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Prevention Measures(2 mappings)

LAOS-CC-Art22LaoCERT
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs NIS2 Directive13 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)12 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 201912 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)12 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs LGPD12 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023)12 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)11 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)11 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSaudi PDPL vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 715 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) has 33 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Prevention Measures, where 5 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 33 total Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls, 8 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

25 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Prevention Measures with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Prevention Measures (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.