TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Barbados Data Protection Act 2019vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 35% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part III: Rights of a Data Subject.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Part I: Preliminary(2 mappings)

BB-DPA-1Section 1 - Short Title
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
BB-DPA-2Section 2 - Interpretation
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part III: Rights of a Data Subject(1 mappings)

BB-DPA-14Section 15 - Right to Data Portability
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part IV: Transfers of Personal Data Outside Barbados(1 mappings)

BB-DPA-16Section 22 - General Principle for Transfers
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part VI: Data Controller and Data Processor(5 mappings)

BB-DPA-20Sections 50-60 - Registration and Responsibilities4 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
BB-DPA-21Sections 61-69 - Data Privacy Officer
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part VII: Data Protection Commissioner(1 mappings)

BB-DPA-22Sections 70-75 - Commissioner Functions
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)

Part II: Data Protection Principles(1 mappings)

BB-DPA-4Section 4 - Principles Relating to Processing
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 comparisons

Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Rwanda Law No. 058/2021 Relating to the Protection of Personal Data13 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs GDPR12 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs NIS2 Directive9 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)9 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) - Digital Payment Token Regulation8 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs MiFID II / MiFIR8 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Law No. 09-08 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data8 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Turkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK - Law No. 6698)8 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSaudi PDPL vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 704 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 has 23 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part III: Rights of a Data Subject, where 5 Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 23 total Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 controls, 8 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

15 Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part III: Rights of a Data Subject with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Barbados Data Protection Act 2019 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part III: Rights of a Data Subject (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.