Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 47% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(18 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight3 targets
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management5 targets
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-27BCP Scope
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework5 targets
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
CPS230-13Incident Management
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan2 targets
CPS230-25Business Continuity Policy
CPS230-26Business Continuity Plans

Security Operations(2 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery2 targets
CPS230-13Incident Management
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 19 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 9 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 19 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 9 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

10 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.