Cross-Framework Mapping

ITIL 4vsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)

See exactly how ITIL 4 controls map to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
48
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ITIL 4 maps to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 ITIL 4 controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ITIL 4: Service Transition.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

ITIL 4: Service Strategy & Design(2 mappings)

ITIL4-03Capacity and availability management2 targets
SOCI-S30BCNotification of critical cyber security incidents (12 hours)
SOCI-S30BDNotification of other cyber security incidents (72 hours)

ITIL 4: Service Operation(3 mappings)

ITIL4-11Incident management3 targets
SOCI-CIRMP-PHYSICALCIRMP hazard vector: Physical security and natural hazards
SOCI-S30CBStatutory incident response planning
SOCI-S35ABMinisterial authorisation for government assistance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ITIL 4 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

ITIL 4 has 53 controls across its framework, while Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ITIL 4: Service Transition, where 5 ITIL 4 controls have no direct Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) equivalent.

How many controls map between ITIL 4 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

Of 53 total ITIL 4 controls, 2 map directly to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITIL 4 to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

51 ITIL 4 controls have no direct equivalent in Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). The highest concentration of gaps is in ITIL 4: Service Transition with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ITIL 4 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ITIL 4: Service Transition (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.