ITIL 4vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification
See exactly how ITIL 4 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ITIL 4 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 ITIL 4 controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ITIL 4: Service Transition.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
ITIL 4: Service Strategy & Design(1 mappings)
ITIL 4: Service Operation(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ITIL 4 comparisons
Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ITIL 4 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
ITIL 4 has 53 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ITIL 4: Service Transition, where 5 ITIL 4 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.
How many controls map between ITIL 4 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
Of 53 total ITIL 4 controls, 2 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITIL 4 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
51 ITIL 4 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in ITIL 4: Service Transition with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ITIL 4 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
The domain with the highest gap count is ITIL 4: Service Transition (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.