ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020vsISO 31000:2018
See exactly how ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls map to ISO 31000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 maps to ISO 31000:2018 with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Stakeholders – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(5 mappings)
Clause 8 – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(2 mappings)
Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 comparisons
Other ISO 31000:2018 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO 31000:2018?
ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 has 54 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000:2018 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020, where 23 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls have no direct ISO 31000:2018 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO 31000:2018?
Of 54 total ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls, 8 map directly to ISO 31000:2018 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 to ISO 31000:2018?
46 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO 31000:2018?
The domain with the highest gap count is Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.