ISO/IEC 38500:2024vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 38500:2024 maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 17% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 66 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls identifies 55 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 66 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(10 mappings)
Model for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 38500:2024 comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
ISO/IEC 38500:2024 has 66 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024, where 33 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 66 total ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls, 11 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 55 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 38500:2024 to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
55 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024 with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024 (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.