Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsNIST SP 800-144

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to NIST SP 800-144. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to NIST SP 800-144 with 18% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 318K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 318K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(5 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions
NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
30111-1Scope
NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration
30111-3Terms and definitions3 targets
NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration
NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance

Legal(1 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(2 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration

Disclosure Artefacts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration

Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)

29147-7.8Remediation information
NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(1 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (318K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and NIST SP 800-144?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-144 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-144 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and NIST SP 800-144?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 9 map directly to NIST SP 800-144 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to NIST SP 800-144?

39 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-144. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and NIST SP 800-144?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.