Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 18% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 702 frameworks | 342K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 342K+ mappings across 702 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(6 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
30111-1Scope
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
30111-3Terms and definitions3 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
FedRAMP-IncidentReportingFedRAMP incident reporting to PMO and US-CERT

Legal(1 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(2 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests

Disclosure Artefacts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests

Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)

29147-7.8Remediation information
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(2 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 702 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 702 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (342K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 9 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to FedRAMP Rev 5?

39 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.