ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsSingapore Cybersecurity Act 2018
See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 with 22% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction(5 mappings)
Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(2 mappings)
Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)
Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons
Other Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018?
ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 32 controls across its framework, while Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018?
Of 32 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 7 map directly to Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018?
25 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.