Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(8 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
30111-1Scope
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
30111-3Terms and definitions4 targets
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Disclosure Artefacts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)

29147-7.8Remediation information
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(3 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 7 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

41 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.