ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(9 mappings)
Device(1 mappings)
Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
37 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.