Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Foundation(4 mappings)

27031-5.1IRBC Policy4 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy

Clause 4-5: Overview and IRBC Concepts(4 mappings)

27031-5.1IRBC Policy4 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy

Strategy(2 mappings)

27031-7.2Resource Requirements2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

Clause 7: IRBC Planning and Objectives(2 mappings)

27031-7.2Resource Requirements2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27031:2011 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 27 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implement, where 4 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

35 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implement with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implement (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.