NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management with 19% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AI RMF Functions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
AI RMF Functions(20 mappings)
+9 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AI RMF Functions, where 21 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?
Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 10 map directly to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?
42 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in AI RMF Functions with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is AI RMF Functions (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.