ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsPCI PIN Security
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to PCI PIN Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to PCI PIN Security with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 9: Monitor and Review.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 4-5: Overview and IRBC Concepts(1 mappings)
Clause 7: IRBC Planning and Objectives(4 mappings)
Clause 8: IRBC Implementation(5 mappings)
Clause 9: Monitor and Review(1 mappings)
Annexes: Supporting Guidance(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27031:2011 comparisons
Other PCI PIN Security comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?
ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 22 controls across its framework, while PCI PIN Security covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9: Monitor and Review, where 3 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct PCI PIN Security equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?
Of 22 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 8 map directly to PCI PIN Security controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to PCI PIN Security?
14 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in PCI PIN Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9: Monitor and Review with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9: Monitor and Review (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.