Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsPCI PIN Security

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to PCI PIN Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to PCI PIN Security with 30% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Foundation(1 mappings)

27031-5.1IRBC Policy
PCI-PIN-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Clause 4-5: Overview and IRBC Concepts(1 mappings)

27031-5.1IRBC Policy
PCI-PIN-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Strategy(4 mappings)

27031-7.1IRBC Strategy2 targets
PCI-PIN-11Business continuity planning and testing
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures
27031-7.2Resource Requirements2 targets
PCI-PIN-11Business continuity planning and testing
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures

Clause 7: IRBC Planning and Objectives(4 mappings)

27031-7.1IRBC Strategy2 targets
PCI-PIN-11Business continuity planning and testing
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures
27031-7.2Resource Requirements2 targets
PCI-PIN-11Business continuity planning and testing
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures

Operate(5 mappings)

27031-8.1Exercising and Testing4 targets
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures
PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures
27031-8.2Maintaining IRBC
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures

Clause 8: IRBC Implementation(5 mappings)

27031-8.1Exercising and Testing4 targets
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures
PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures
27031-8.2Maintaining IRBC
PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 27 controls across its framework, while PCI PIN Security covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implement, where 4 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct PCI PIN Security equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?

Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 14 map directly to PCI PIN Security controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to PCI PIN Security?

25 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in PCI PIN Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implement with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and PCI PIN Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implement (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.