Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsHKMA SPM

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to HKMA SPM. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
60
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to HKMA SPM with 12% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 60 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27031:2011.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 1,111 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,111 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27031:2011(8 mappings)

27031-5.1IRBC Policy
→HKMA-SPM-CG-IC-AC-Governance-Control-AuditHKMA SPM Corporate Governance (CG-1/2/3/5/6), Internal Control (IC-1/5), Auditing (AC-G)
27031-7.1IRBC Strategy
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-7.2Resource Requirements
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-8.1Exercising and Testing
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-8.2Maintaining IRBC
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-9.3Management Review
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-BHigh availability embedded systems
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
27031-DDeveloping performance criteria
→HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to HKMA SPM crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which HKMA SPM controls your existing ISO/IEC 27031:2011 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 into HKMA SPM
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

HKMA SPM into ISO/IEC 27031:2011
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to HKMA SPM (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many HKMA SPM controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,111 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,111 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and HKMA SPM?

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 68 controls across its framework, while HKMA SPM covers 88 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27031:2011, where 19 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct HKMA SPM equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and HKMA SPM?

Of 68 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 8 map directly to HKMA SPM controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 60 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to HKMA SPM?

60 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA SPM. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27031:2011 with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and HKMA SPM?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27031:2011 (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.