Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27014:2020vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(6 mappings)

27014-1Scope2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
27014-3Terms and definitions2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
29134-3Terms and definitions2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities

Clause 5: Guiding Principles(1 mappings)

27014-5.6Continuous improvement
NISTSP34-5Plan Testing, Training, and Exercises (TTE)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 has 39 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes, where 6 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 39 total ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls, 4 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27014:2020 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

40 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.