ISO/IEC 27014:2020vsIATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls map to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27014:2020 maps to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(10 mappings)
Clause 5: Guiding Principles(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons
Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
ISO/IEC 27014:2020 has 26 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes, where 6 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
Of 26 total ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls, 5 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27014:2020 to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
21 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.