ISO/IEC 27014:2020vsISO/IEC 27003:2017
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27014:2020 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(7 mappings)
Clause 5: Guiding Principles(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?
ISO/IEC 27014:2020 has 26 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes, where 6 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?
Of 26 total ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27014:2020 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?
21 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.