Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27006:2024vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27006:2024 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls identifies 56 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Resource Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(4 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.2Personnel
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Clause 5: Structural Requirements(6 mappings)

ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27006:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

ISO/IEC 27006:2024 has 52 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Resource Requirements, where 14 ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27006:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 52 total ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls, 4 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 56 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27006:2024 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

56 ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Resource Requirements with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27006:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Resource Requirements (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.