Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsSingapore AI Governance Framework

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to Singapore AI Governance Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to Singapore AI Governance Framework with 14% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 56 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Guidance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 56 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Framework (Clause 5)(18 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment6 targets
SG-AIGF-03Bias detection and mitigation
SG-AIGF-04AI model validation and testing
SG-AIGF-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring
SG-AIGF-21AI system robustness and resilience
SG-AIGF-23AI model security and integrity
SG-AIGF-24Safe AI deployment procedures
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration6 targets
SG-AIGF-03Bias detection and mitigation
SG-AIGF-04AI model validation and testing
SG-AIGF-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring
SG-AIGF-21AI system robustness and resilience
SG-AIGF-23AI model security and integrity
SG-AIGF-24Safe AI deployment procedures
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation6 targets
SG-AIGF-03Bias detection and mitigation
SG-AIGF-04AI model validation and testing
SG-AIGF-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring
SG-AIGF-21AI system robustness and resilience
SG-AIGF-23AI model security and integrity
SG-AIGF-24Safe AI deployment procedures

Process (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
SG-AIGF-01AI risk identification and assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
SG-AIGF-01AI risk identification and assessment

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and Singapore AI Governance Framework?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 56 controls across its framework, while Singapore AI Governance Framework covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Guidance, where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct Singapore AI Governance Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and Singapore AI Governance Framework?

Of 56 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 8 map directly to Singapore AI Governance Framework controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to Singapore AI Governance Framework?

48 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore AI Governance Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Guidance with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and Singapore AI Governance Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Guidance (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.