TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsISO 14004:2016

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to ISO 14004:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to ISO 14004:2016 with 0% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 56 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Guidance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 56 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Framework(4 mappings)

23894-5.2Leadership and Commitment
→iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
23894-5.4.1Understanding Organization and Context
→iso-14004-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
23894-5.4.3Roles, Authorities, Responsibilities
→iso-14004-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
23894-5.5Communication and Consultation
→iso-14004-2016::7.4Communication

Principles (Clause 4)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
→iso-14004-2016::10.3Continual improvement

Framework (Clause 5)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
→iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment

Process (Clause 6)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-6.1Communication and Consultation
→iso-14004-2016::7.4Communication

Framework – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(5 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::5.1General
→iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.2Leadership and commitment
→iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-14004-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.3Assigning organizational roles, authorities, responsibilities and
→iso-14004-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.5Implementation
→iso-14004-2016::10.3.2Implementation of continual improvement

Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(5 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::6.1General
→iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.2Communication and consultation
→iso-14004-2016::7.4Communication
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.3.1General
→iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.4.1General
→iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.5.1General
→iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)11 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence10 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System10 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201710 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs MTCS (Singapore)10 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management10 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems10 mappings

Other ISO 14004:2016 comparisons

ISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 14004:201625 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 14004:201617 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 14004:201616 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14004:201615 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs ISO 14004:201615 mappingsISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems vs ISO 14004:201614 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 14004:201614 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 14004:201614 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 14004:2016?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 56 controls across its framework, while ISO 14004:2016 covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Guidance, where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct ISO 14004:2016 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 14004:2016?

Of 56 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 7 map directly to ISO 14004:2016 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to ISO 14004:2016?

49 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 14004:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Guidance with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 14004:2016?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Guidance (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.