Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsISO 27005:2022

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to ISO 27005:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
75
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to ISO 27005:2022 with 12% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 85 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 75 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 85 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Framework(2 mappings)

23894-5.2Leadership and Commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment
23894-5.5Communication and Consultation
iso-27005-2022::10.3Communication and consultation

Process(1 mappings)

23894-6.6Monitoring and Review
iso-27005-2022::10.5Monitoring and review

Principles (Clause 4)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
iso-27005-2022::10.8Continual improvement

Framework (Clause 5)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment

Process (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-6.1Communication and Consultation
iso-27005-2022::10.3Communication and consultation
ISO23894-6.5Monitoring and Review
iso-27005-2022::10.5Monitoring and review

Framework – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(1 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::5.2Leadership and commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment

Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(2 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::6.2Communication and consultation
iso-27005-2022::10.3Communication and consultation
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.6Monitoring and review
iso-27005-2022::10.5Monitoring and review

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005:2022?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 85 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005:2022 covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023, where 15 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct ISO 27005:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005:2022?

Of 85 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 10 map directly to ISO 27005:2022 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 75 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to ISO 27005:2022?

75 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.