Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsISO 27005:2022

See exactly how AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to ISO 27005:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System maps to ISO 27005:2022 with 16% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 61 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-10.3Continual Improvement
iso-27005-2022::10.8Continual improvement
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
iso-27005-2022::10.8Continual improvement

Leadership (Clause 5)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment
ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment

Support (Clause 7)(7 mappings)

AS9100D-7.5Documented Information3 targets
iso-27005-2022::10.4Documented information
iso-27005-2022::10.4.2Documented information about processes
iso-27005-2022::10.4.3Documented information about results
ISO27003-7.4Communication
iso-27005-2022::10.3Communication and consultation
ISO27003-7.5Documented Information3 targets
iso-27005-2022::10.4Documented information
iso-27005-2022::10.4.2Documented information about processes
iso-27005-2022::10.4.3Documented information about results

Performance(1 mappings)

AS9100D-9.3Management Review
iso-27005-2022::10.6Management review

Performance Evaluation (Clause 9)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-9.3Management Review
iso-27005-2022::10.6Management review
ISO27003-9.3Management Review
iso-27005-2022::10.6Management review

Operation (Clause 8)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
iso-27005-2022::8.6Information security risk treatment plan

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 27005:2022?

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System has 61 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005:2022 covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 12 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct ISO 27005:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 27005:2022?

Of 61 total AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27005:2022 controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 61 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System to ISO 27005:2022?

61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 27005:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.