TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 19011:2018vsISO 27005:2022

See exactly how ISO 19011:2018 controls map to ISO 27005:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 19011:2018 maps to ISO 27005:2022 with 20% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 55 ISO 19011:2018 controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 55 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Managing an audit programme – ISO 19011:2018(6 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::5.3Determining and evaluating audit programme risks and opportunities
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk
iso-19011-2018::5.4.4Determining audit programme resources
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk
iso-19011-2018::5.5.3Selecting and determining audit methods
→iso-27005-2022::6.5Choosing an appropriate method
iso-19011-2018::5.5.5Assigning responsibility for an individual audit to the audit team leader2 targets
→iso-27005-2022::7.3Analysing information security risks
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.3Assessing likelihood
iso-19011-2018::5.6Monitoring audit programme
→iso-27005-2022::10.5Monitoring and review

Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018(2 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::6.2.3Determining feasibility of audit
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk
iso-19011-2018::6.4.9Determining audit conclusions
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk

Competence and evaluation of auditors – ISO 19011:2018(5 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::7.2Determining auditor competence
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk
iso-19011-2018::7.2.5Achieving audit team leader competence
→iso-27005-2022::7.3.2Assessing potential consequences
iso-19011-2018::7.3Establishing auditor evaluation criteria2 targets
→iso-27005-2022::6.4Establishing and maintaining information security risk criteria
→iso-27005-2022::6.4.2Risk acceptance criteria
iso-19011-2018::7.4Selecting appropriate auditor evaluation method
→iso-27005-2022::6.5Choosing an appropriate method

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 19011:2018 comparisons

ISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14001:201546 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14004:201643 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 31000:201842 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 45001:201839 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27701:201933 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 37301:202133 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 13485:201633 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 22000:201831 mappings

Other ISO 27005:2022 comparisons

ISO 14004:2016 vs ISO 27005:202213 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs ISO 27005:202210 mappingsISO 13485:2016 vs ISO 27005:20229 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27005:20229 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 27005:20228 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 27005:20228 mappingsISO 55001:2014 vs ISO 27005:20227 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 27005:20227 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27005:2022?

ISO 19011:2018 has 55 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005:2022 covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018, where 24 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct ISO 27005:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27005:2022?

Of 55 total ISO 19011:2018 controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27005:2022 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 19011:2018 to ISO 27005:2022?

44 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27005:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.