Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsISO 27005

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
60
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to ISO 27005 with 14% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 85 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 73 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 85 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Framework(1 mappings)

23894-5.4.2AI Risk Management Policy
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope

Scope, Terms and References (Clauses 1-3)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope

Framework (Clause 5)(9 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Process (Clause 6)(9 mappings)

ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 85 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023, where 13 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005?

Of 85 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 12 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 73 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to ISO 27005?

73 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 27005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.