Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsISO 13485:2016

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to ISO 13485:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
68
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to ISO 13485:2016 with 11% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 85 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 76 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 85 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Framework(1 mappings)

23894-5.5Communication and Consultation
iso-13485-2016::7.2.3Communication

Process (Clause 6)(1 mappings)

ISO23894-6.1Communication and Consultation
iso-13485-2016::7.2.3Communication

Framework – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(10 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::5.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design9 targets
iso-13485-2016::7.3Design and development
iso-13485-2016::7.3.10Design and development files
iso-13485-2016::7.3.2Design and development planning
iso-13485-2016::7.3.3Design and development inputs
iso-13485-2016::7.3.4Design and development outputs
iso-13485-2016::7.3.5Design and development review
iso-13485-2016::7.3.6Design and development verification
iso-13485-2016::7.3.7Design and development validation
iso-13485-2016::7.3.8Design and development transfer

Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(5 mappings)

iso-iec-23894-2023::6.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.2Communication and consultation
iso-13485-2016::7.2.3Communication
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.3.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.4.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.5.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 13485:2016?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 85 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485:2016 covers 83 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023, where 12 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct ISO 13485:2016 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 13485:2016?

Of 85 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 9 map directly to ISO 13485:2016 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 76 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to ISO 13485:2016?

76 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO 13485:2016?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.