Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 33% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles (Clause 4).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope, Terms and References (Clauses 1-3)(4 mappings)

ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Framework (Clause 5)(16 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment6 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration6 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation4 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 33 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles (Clause 4), where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 33 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 11 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

22 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles (Clause 4) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (Clause 4) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.