Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 36% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles (Clause 4).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope, Terms and References (Clauses 1-3)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT

Framework (Clause 5)(6 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach

Process (Clause 6)(7 mappings)

ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification4 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

AI-Specific Risk Sources (Annex A)(5 mappings)

ISO23894-A.1Data Quality and Representativeness3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
ISO23894-A.5Privacy and Data Protection in AI2 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 33 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles (Clause 4), where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Of 33 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 12 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

21 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles (Clause 4) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (Clause 4) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.