ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004vsISO/IEC 38500:2024
See exactly how ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls map to ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 maps to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 with 100% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 3 ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General requirements – ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 3 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
General requirements – ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004(11 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 38500:2024 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?
ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 has 3 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 38500:2024 covers 66 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General requirements – ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004, where 0 ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 38500:2024 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?
Of 3 total ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls — representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 to ISO/IEC 38500:2024?
0 ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 38500:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in General requirements – ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?
The domain with the highest gap count is General requirements – ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.