TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 56002vsISO/IEC 42001:2023

See exactly how ISO 56002 controls map to ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

98
Controls Mapped
66
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 56002 maps to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 60% coverage across 98 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 164 ISO 56002 controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 164 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 98 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 10: Improvement(12 mappings)

ISO-22313-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-22313-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
ISO-37002-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-37002-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
ISO-39001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-39001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
ISO-41001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-41001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
ISO-50001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-50001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
ISO-56002-10.2Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-56002-10.3Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement

Clause 4: Context of the Organization(8 mappings)

ISO-22313-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-22313-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-37002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-37002-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-37002-4.3Determining the scope of the whistleblowing management system
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.3Determining the scope of the management system
ISO-39001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-39001-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-39001-4.3Determining the scope of the RTS management system
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.3Determining the scope of the management system

+78 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 56002 comparisons

ISO 56002 vs ISO 22301:201986 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 45001:201885 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 9001:201581 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 37301:202180 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 22000:201879 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 14001:201579 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 37001:201678 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 27701:201978 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 42001:2023 comparisons

ISO 22301:2019 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202333 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202330 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202330 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202328 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202328 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202327 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

ISO 56002 has 164 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 98 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 16 ISO 56002 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 42001:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

Of 164 total ISO 56002 controls, 98 map directly to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 56002 to ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

66 ISO 56002 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 42001:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.