TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO/IEC 42001:2023

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 44% coverage across 31 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(4 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action2 targets
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement2 targets
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement
→iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(4 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-22000-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the food safety management system
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.3Determining the scope of the management system
iso-22000-2018::4.4Food safety management system
→iso-iec-42001-2023::4.4Management system

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(3 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-iec-42001-2023::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
→iso-iec-42001-2023::5.2Policy
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-iec-42001-2023::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-iec-42001-2023::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-22000-2018::6.2Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them
→iso-iec-42001-2023::6.2Objectives and planning to achieve them

Support – ISO 22000:2018(7 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::7.1Resources2 targets
→iso-iec-42001-2023::7.1Resources
→iso-iec-42001-2023::A.4Resources for AI systems
iso-22000-2018::7.2Competence
→iso-iec-42001-2023::7.2Competence
iso-22000-2018::7.3Awareness
→iso-iec-42001-2023::7.3Awareness
iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication2 targets
→A.8.4Communication of incidents
→iso-iec-42001-2023::7.4Communication
iso-22000-2018::7.5Documented information
→iso-iec-42001-2023::7.5Documented information

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 9001:201555 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 27701:201942 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14001:201536 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37001:201633 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37301:202132 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems29 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 42001:2023 comparisons

ISO 22301:2019 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202333 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202330 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202330 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202328 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202328 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202327 mappingsISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems vs ISO/IEC 42001:202323 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 31 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 15 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 42001:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 31 map directly to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

39 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 42001:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.