ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management SystemsvsISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
See exactly how ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 8% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 145 ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls identifies 134 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 145 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 5: Leadership(1 mappings)
Clause 6: Planning(2 mappings)
Clause 10: Improvement(9 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the Organization(8 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems has 145 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 34 ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
Of 145 total ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls, 11 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 134 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
134 ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.