ISO 37001:2016vsUS Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 37001:2016 maps to US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) with 32% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Support – ISO 37001:2016.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 694 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 694 frameworks.
Improvement – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)
Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)
Operation – ISO 37001:2016(16 mappings)
+4 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 694 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A ISO 37001:2016 to US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) controls your existing ISO 37001:2016 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 32% in the header counts how many ISO 37001:2016 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons
Other US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 694 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 694 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)?
ISO 37001:2016 has 38 controls across its framework, while US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support – ISO 37001:2016, where 10 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)?
Of 38 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 12 map directly to US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) controls, representing 32% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)?
31 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Support – ISO 37001:2016 with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Support – ISO 37001:2016 (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.