TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsISO 22000

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to ISO 22000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to ISO 22000 with 24% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→ISO22000-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-37001-2016::10.2Continual improvement
→ISO22000-10.3Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→ISO22000-4.1Understanding the organization and its context

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
→ISO22000-5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→ISO22000-5.3Roles, responsibilities, and authorities

Clause 6 – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→ISO22000-6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities

Support – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information
→ISO22000-7.5Documented information

Performance evaluation – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
→ISO22000-9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation
iso-37001-2016::9.2Internal audit
→ISO22000-9.2Internal audit
iso-37001-2016::9.3Management review
→ISO22000-9.3Management review

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 37301:202134 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 9001:201532 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202329 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 27701:201928 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 45001:201823 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 14001:201523 mappings

Other ISO 22000 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 2200020 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 2200011 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO 22000 covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 37001:2016, where 10 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct ISO 22000 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 10 map directly to ISO 22000 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to ISO 22000?

31 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22000. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 37001:2016 with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 37001:2016 (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.