TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 ISO 31000 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(2 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation2 targets
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development2 targets
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(2 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance
→ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
→ISMSP-MS-04Management Review and Improvement

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 31000 comparisons

ISO 31000 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation7 mappingsISO 31000 vs COSO ERM7 mappingsISO 31000 vs ISO 270057 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO 31000 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange7 mappingsISO 31000 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappingsISO 31000 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20177 mappingsISO 31000 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappings

Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and South Korea ISMS-P?

ISO 31000 has 20 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 31000 controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 20 total ISO 31000 controls, 7 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to South Korea ISMS-P?

13 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 31000: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.