Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsNIST SP 800-37

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to NIST SP 800-37. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to NIST SP 800-37 with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(6 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment2 targets
NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-37?

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 42 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-37 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 13 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct NIST SP 800-37 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-37?

Of 42 total AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-37 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to NIST SP 800-37?

39 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-37. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-37?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.