Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsAPRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO 31000 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(10 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope5 targets
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
ISO31000-05Risk management integration5 targets
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
SPS220-22Risk Identification and Assessment
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
SPS220-22Risk Identification and Assessment
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis
SPS220-22Risk Identification and Assessment

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(5 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance5 targets
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
SPS220-29Operational Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

ISO 31000 has 43 controls across its framework, while APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles, where 9 ISO 31000 controls have no direct APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

Of 43 total ISO 31000 controls, 6 map directly to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

37 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation). The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.