Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000:2018vsISO 14004:2016

See exactly how ISO 31000:2018 controls map to ISO 14004:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000:2018 maps to ISO 14004:2016 with 0% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO 31000:2018 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Principles(1 mappings)

4.hContinual improvement
iso-14004-2016::10.3Continual improvement

Process(8 mappings)

6.5.1General risk treatment8 targets
iso-14004-2016::10.1General
iso-14004-2016::4.2.1General
iso-14004-2016::4.4.1General
iso-14004-2016::6.1.1General
iso-14004-2016::6.2.1General
iso-14004-2016::7.4.1General
iso-14004-2016::7.5.1General
iso-14004-2016::9.1.1General

Framework – ISO 31000:2018(5 mappings)

iso-31000-2018::5.1General
iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-31000-2018::5.2Leadership and commitment
iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-31000-2018::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-14004-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-31000-2018::5.5Implementation
iso-14004-2016::10.3.2Implementation of continual improvement
iso-31000-2018::5.6Evaluation
iso-14004-2016::9.1.2Evaluation of compliance

Process – ISO 31000:2018(5 mappings)

iso-31000-2018::6.1General
iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-31000-2018::6.2Communication and consultation
iso-14004-2016::7.4Communication
iso-31000-2018::6.3.1General
iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-31000-2018::6.4.1General
iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
iso-31000-2018::6.5.1General
iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 14004:2016?

ISO 31000:2018 has 32 controls across its framework, while ISO 14004:2016 covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process, where 13 ISO 31000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 14004:2016 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 14004:2016?

Of 32 total ISO 31000:2018 controls, 2 map directly to ISO 14004:2016 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000:2018 to ISO 14004:2016?

30 ISO 31000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 14004:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in Process with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 14004:2016?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.