Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security ManagementvsFBI CJIS Security Policy

See exactly how ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls map to FBI CJIS Security Policy. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management maps to FBI CJIS Security Policy with 17% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Physical Security Countermeasures.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Process and Procedural Controls(2 mappings)

ISO28001-PC-03Supply Chain Incident Reporting
CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO28001-PC-04Supply Chain Continuity Planning
CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management

Personnel and Information Security(2 mappings)

ISO28001-PI-01Personnel Security Screening
CJIS-3Personnel Security
ISO28001-PI-02Security Awareness and Training
CJIS-2Security Awareness Training

Physical Security Countermeasures(1 mappings)

ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security
CJIS-14Physical Protection

Supply Chain Security Assessment(1 mappings)

ISO28001-SA-04Security Risk Treatment Planning
CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management has 36 controls across its framework, while FBI CJIS Security Policy covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Physical Security Countermeasures, where 3 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct FBI CJIS Security Policy equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

Of 36 total ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls, 6 map directly to FBI CJIS Security Policy controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management to FBI CJIS Security Policy?

30 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct equivalent in FBI CJIS Security Policy. The highest concentration of gaps is in Physical Security Countermeasures with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

The domain with the highest gap count is Physical Security Countermeasures (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.