Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 17% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(5 mappings)

ISO27799-01ePHI access controls and authorization2 targets
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards(3 mappings)

ISO27799-06Security management process and risk analysis2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
ISO27799-08Information access management
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

ISO 27799: Technical Safeguards(3 mappings)

ISO27799-12Unique user identification and authentication
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

ISO 27799: Physical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO27799-17Facility access controls
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 4 ISO 27799 controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 8 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

38 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.